HB 1346 - TV Efficiency Standards
Current Bill Status
12/1/11 HB1346: Carried over to 2012 Regular Session.
About the Measure
Measure Title:
Relating to Energy Efficiency
Report Title:
Energy Efficiency; Televisions; ENERGY STAR
Description:
Requires new televisions manufactured on or after 7/1/12, with a viewable screen area of 1,400 square inches or less and sold in the State to meet ENERGY STAR efficiency specifications.
Our Testimony
Chair Morita and members of the Committee:
The Blue Planet Foundation supports HB 1346, a measure which establishes minimum energy efficiency standards for televisions sold in Hawai‘i. This is an appropriate policy tool to address a growing energy problems and help Hawai‘i achieve its aggressive clean energy goals.
Television energy efficiency standards will save substantial electricity—and oil
Based on California television electricity consumption patterns
[1], Blue Planet estimates that the typical TV in Hawai‘i consumes about 250 kilowatt-hours of electricity annually. If approximately one million TVs are in use in Hawai‘i (a per capita approximation given California’s estimates), 250 gigawatt-hours of electricity are consumed annually in Hawai‘i. Given a statewide average residential electricity rate of $0.29 per kilowatt-hour, this translates to $72.5 million spent annually on electricity just to power TVs. The energy efficiency standards contemplated in HB 1346—modeled after California’s standards—could reduce the per-TV consumption by 33% or more.
At full adoption, this would result in a savings of nearly $24 million annually while preventing the burning of over 170,000 barrels of oil for electricity annually.
Energy efficiency standards are smart policy
Setting standards for appliances such as televisions overcome intractable consumer buying habits. Consumers have proven to be terribly myopic in their purchasing decisions when it comes to energy saving technologies. Despite the environmental and long-term economic advantages of high efficiency appliances, such choices are passed over in favor of lower efficiency counterparts because of their initial cost or availability.
An examination of some of the economic barriers present in the diffusion of energy efficiency technologies provides insight into the challenges of greater adoption of efficient appliances Empirical studies examining the purchase of energy-saving devices reveal that high initial investment costs—regardless of the money savings from reduced electricity use—fosters to a tendency to avoid energy saving innovations. These decisions can result in outcomes that are economically suboptimal considering likely investment alternatives available to the decision maker. By foregoing certain energy efficiency investments, individuals demonstrate implied discount rates that are frequently an order of magnitude or higher over the prevailing discount rate.
A 1983 study on refrigerators
[2] is notable for being one of the first to use very specific data and a simple technique. They examined two refrigerator models sold by the same national retailer between 1977 and 1979. The two refrigerators were identical in nearly every way except their energy use and cost: one used 410 kilowatt-hour (kWh) per year less electricity but cost $60 more. Using a 6% discount rate and a 20-year lifetime, the more efficient refrigerator saved energy at an electricity cost of just over one cent per kWh—lower than electricity prices prevailing in every state at the time. Despite being widely advertised and being recommended by a prominent consumer magazine, the energy-efficient refrigerator was purchased by customers less frequently than the less expensive inefficient model. Using regional electricity cost data, Meier and Whittier calculated the implied discount rate by these purchases, which varied between 34% and 59%, depending on the region’s prevailing residential electricity rate.
A precedent exists for television efficiency standards
In November 2009, the California Energy Commission (CEC) adopted rules that require television manufacturers to produce new models that use 33 percent less electricity by 2011 and 49 percent less electricity by 2013. At the time, the chairwoman of the CEC was quoted
[3] as saying: “This is a consumer protection measure, a measure that will protect the environment and which will save us from building a massive new power plant.” California is a large market for consumer appliances such as televisions. Hawai‘i can ride on its coattails and ensure that televisions being sold in the state also meet basic energy efficiency standards.
Please forward HB 1346 to help Hawai‘i residents save money and to help the state achieve its clean energy goals.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify.
[1] http://www.energy.ca.gov/appliances/tv_faqs.html
[2] Meier, A., and Whittier, J. (1983). Consumer Discount Rates Implied by Purchases of Energy-Efficient Refrigerators.
International Journal of Energy, 8(12), 957-962.
[3] http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/california-approves-tv-efficiency-rules/
Submit your own testimony